Can.
In a "fight", not a literally fight.
Yes, because in fact I do see a resemblance between boxing and investing.
For example: if a boxer’s main goal is to win the game, then the main
goal of an investor is to make a profit.
Now, let’s start with an analysis of a boxer.
As I mentioned above, the boxer’s main goal, is to win the game.
And although victory with a KO (knock out) is a beautiful victory, but no one says that a boxer must win the fight with a KO.
And although victory with a KO (knock out) is a beautiful victory, but no one says that a boxer must win the fight with a KO.
That’s why I think Floyd Mayweather deserves to be the best
boxer.
Mayweather is a boxer who places victory as his primary
target. Though it should mean presenting a boring and unattractive match. Look
at Mayweather’s game: running, hugging, dodging and occasionally hitting. He rarely
hit hard. But he often blows lightly. And the jury counts the number of clean
punches that go into the opponent, regardless it’s hard or not. That’s the most
important point. And Mayweather really understands this.
Equally important, Mayweather always tries to take the
opponent's punches as little as possible. This is where Mayweather’s main
advantage is: he is very fast. His opponent had a hard time hitting a clean
blow to Mayweather's body. Mayweather always ran, dodged and embraced to
prevent an opponent's blows from entering his body.
So it's clear, in every game, Mayweather always hits more than taking a hit, so he consistently wins (regardless of the amount
of scorn he received after the games).
He doesn’t care about the scorns people make. Victory is his ultimate goal. For the record, he has played 50 times, has never lost and win the game with a knockout as much as 27 times. Note that the accumulation of light punches that he launched, able to give a fairly good percentage of KO victory, ie 54%.
He doesn’t care about the scorns people make. Victory is his ultimate goal. For the record, he has played 50 times, has never lost and win the game with a knockout as much as 27 times. Note that the accumulation of light punches that he launched, able to give a fairly good percentage of KO victory, ie 54%.
Now, imagine that a successful blow you wielded as an investment gain,
and the blow you receive is an investment loss.
The key to your success in investing is to make profits
while avoiding losses as often as possible.
The gain on investment will add to your wealth. Even small gains (as well as light punches in boxing), which are consistently accumulated, can be very big thanks to the compounding effect.
But on the other side, investment losses reduce your wealth. To make matters
worse, investment losses undermine the ability of your money to multiply.
As an illustration: if in year 1, your investment value increases 10%, and in year 2, your investment value down 10%, then at the end of year 2, your investment value is only 99% of its original value. That is a 1% loss. Even though you experience the same level of profit (10%) in years 1 and 2.
Therefore, as in boxing, losses should be avoided.
As an illustration: if in year 1, your investment value increases 10%, and in year 2, your investment value down 10%, then at the end of year 2, your investment value is only 99% of its original value. That is a 1% loss. Even though you experience the same level of profit (10%) in years 1 and 2.
Therefore, as in boxing, losses should be avoided.
On the other hand, there is a prominent Indonesian investor
named Lo Keng Hong. He is often referred to as Warren Buffett of Indonesia.
Incidentally last week I got a chance to meet him.
There’s not much to dig out of him, to be honest.
The words that came out of him were simple words like:
“Invest in bad times, and sell at good times”.
“Saham (stock) is the best choice”
Hearing him speak making getting-rich-through-stock-investing sounds easy.
His criteria in choosing shares, among them:
- Choose
a company whose owners and operators have good character.
- Choose
a cheap stock.
- Choose
a company whose profit is large.
- Etc.
Uninspiring, isn’t it?
Do not get me wrong, I respect and admire him. Not only rich, he is also funny and humble.
And his track record tells everything.
I just feel that there are many things that he does not
reveal in his investment process.
However, never mind, I also do not intend to discuss the process
and criteria of his investment.
What I want to underline is his investment style.
What makes Lo Keng Hong famous is the incredible profits
that he made in stock investing.
UNTR, MBAI, TINS are a few of the stocks that provides
tremendous gains for him.
Obviously, the huge profits it achieves are not the result
of widespread investment diversification, but from focused and successful
investment. Not infrequently, his big stakes against a company's stock make him the majority shareholder of the company.
If likened to boxer, Lo Keng Hong is Mike Tyson in the
investment world.
But I must explain from the beginning, that Lo Keng Hong is
an exception. He is a different boxer.
As a fighter, Lo Keng Hong rarely throws a punch (maybe even
he rarely fights). But if he sees a good chance, he will let go as hard as
possible, to create a spectacular victory. This is what I mean by a stylish
boxer like Mike Tyson.
However, unlike Mike Tyson, Lo Keng Hong often won and rarely lost (if not, of course he is not as rich as it is today). For the record, in 58 matches that have been passed, Mike Tyson won 50 times, lost 6 times and draw 2 times. His KO victory percentage was 88%.
However, unlike Mike Tyson, Lo Keng Hong often won and rarely lost (if not, of course he is not as rich as it is today).
All investors want to win big. KO victory. Spectacular gains. Get rich
quick. And become a legend.
Unfortunately, not everyone can do such a thing.
Unless you have analytical skills, patience and endurance
such as Lo Keng Hong, I do not recommend you follow his investment style.
Why?
Why?
In every major “big blow” you execute, there is always the
possibility that the blow is not on target. And as Angelo Dundee puts it: “The
punches you miss are the ones that wear you out”.
As an illustration: you have done a sharp analysis of a
stock, and decided to invest most of your money in the stock. However, instead
of rising, the stock does not move. Or, even down, for example. With the huge money you have invested, you are competing against time (opportunity cost).
The point is: there
is always a potential error even if you have done all the necessary actions
correctly.
Again, do not get me wrong.
I am not in a position to advise you to follow Mayweather style (by the way, following Mayweather's style is clearly not a recommendation for short-term trading but investing vigilantly, consistently delivering respected profit in the medium to long term), or Lo Keng Hong style.
Comparing the two is not an apple to apple comparison either, from the beginning.
I am not in a position to advise you to follow Mayweather style (by the way, following Mayweather's style is clearly not a recommendation for short-term trading but investing vigilantly, consistently delivering respected profit in the medium to long term), or Lo Keng Hong style.
Comparing the two is not an apple to apple comparison either, from the beginning.
Answering the question
on the big headline above, there is no winner between Mayweather and Lo Keng
Hong.
There is no right or wrong here.
There is no right or wrong here.
Many roads lead to Rome, and many roads lead to riches.
Choose your own investment style.
At the end, investing is the process of recognizing
yourself.
Disclaimer: This article is not a recommendation to conduct transactions on the intended securities. Any consequences arising from this writing are beyond the responsibility of the author.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar